I even overclocked my monitor to 75hz, and it looked worse even though it read 75 fps in-game. And even then, it was still capped at 60 fps max. I had to actually turn down games in order to get a substantial, fluid frame rate. In a nutshell, 1440p didn't match up with my system's performance output at all. This can be somewhat fixed by enabling vertical sync, but it doesn't work well in every game, causes input lag sometimes, and from what I've observed it's there just to do what it can. The lack of consistency in frames per second in general is noticeable enough to degrade the entire gaming experience. It also is a double loss in performance because the games you do have that pump out over 100 fps tear badly on 60 hz monitors. What I've noticed with my 1440p is if you're running a rig with a 970 or a card of equivalent or lesser performance, playing 2k 1440p resolution with ultra settings will yield framerates under 60 in most AAA games. I had to turn the brightness almost all the way down just to keep it at a comfortable level, especially at night. The desktop work space is very nice to have outside of gaming, especially if you work on editing video or do graphics design.
The fact that you're at 2k 1440p means you really don't need much, if any AA to get smooth models. The 1440p has much higher color quality and makes games look ridiculously beautiful. I ended up purchasing a 1440p 60hz monitor for the resolution later that day, and just picked up a 1080p 144hz recently, so I have the advantage of playing with both of them side by side to give you an accurate insight. I actually already asked this question to /r/pcgaming and got some excellent feedback.
0 kommentar(er)
